Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started

A quality costs scorecard

Juran’s Quality Control Handbook is a reference book for people who “are involved with” quality. The 4th Edition of the handbook includes an article by Frank M. Gryna about Quality Costs.

Gryna says that as companies began to extend the concept of identifying costs to quality they found that costs relating to quality were much larger than had been shown in accounting reports. They also found that the costs of poor quality were avoidable. Over time the meaning of “quality costs” came to mean the costs of poor quality.

Evaluating quality costs enables companies to quantify the size of the quality problem in a way that will have an impact and identifies major opportunities for cost reduction.

Quality Costs can be grouped into categories, which include:

  • Internal Failure Costs, the costs of defects found prior to the product being shipped, such as rework
  • External Failure Costs, the costs of defects found after the product is shipped, such as customer complaints

Some companies publish a scoreboard of quantifiable quality costs and I have created an example scoreboard on the tool that I test. You can see the board above and by clicking on this link: https://share.geckoboard.com/dashboards/KHPNFUUBRGTIRX77

These are the costs that I have included in the example scorecard:

  • Rework: Gryna includes rework in internal failure costs. He defines rework as “the costs of correcting defectives to make them fit for use.” This would be fixing bugs for a development team. 
  • Partially Written Code: I have included the cost of partially written code as an internal failure cost as many development teams have projects that have not been completed, are in the code base and so are a cost. 
  • Customer adjustment is listed as an external failure cost by Gryna. This is “the costs of investigation and adjustment of justified complaints attributable to defective product”. I have included these in my scorecard as customer service. 
  • Customer churn, this is the percentage of customers who the company have lost as customers.
  • Production incidents. These are unintended events in production that reduce service to the customer

The scoreboard represents the quality costs of a company and can be used to illustrate the need for continuous improvement of quality.


Further reading: Juran’s Quality Control Handbook 4th Edition

Advertisement

Published by Mike Harris

Mike has been working in testing for 20 years and is currently the lone tester for Geckoboard. He has been a Test Lead and has also worked as a part of waterfall, lean and agile teams. He is also Programme Secretary of BCS SIGiST. Mike has a B.Sc.(HONS) from Middlesex University and is an Associate of the University of Hertfordshire. He has set up and led a Testing Community of Practice and been part of a successful agile transition. He is Co-Programme Chair of the British Computer Society’s Specialist Interest Group in Software Testing. He also contributed to the e-book Testing Stories and has had articles published by the Ministry of Testing. Follow Mike on Twitter: @TestAndAnalysis

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: